Over 50 Different Vaccine Patents are owned by the CDC

With over 50 different vaccine patents being owned by the CDC, how much faith do you have in it making accurate and credible INDEPENDENT studies?!  By owning so many patents that makes the CDC a FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION!!!!


In an interview with EcoWatch last month, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reiterated his previous statements that the “CDC is a subsidiary of the pharmaceutical industry. The agency owns more than 20 vaccine patents and purchases and sells $4.1 billion in vaccines annually.”

In efforts to fact-check RFK Jr.’s claims, board members with HealthChoice.org and the Director of the Maine Coalition for Vaccine Choice have conducted an independent investigation to uncover just how many vaccine patents are in fact registered to the CDC.


The following is an exert from an editorial written by Ginger Wagner for GreenMedInfo. (The full article can be read by clicking here.)


I have been around long enough to know that vaccine claims have to be checked and rechecked. And since this is a very old claim, one that I would like to be able to state (if it is true), I decided to review it.


I am fortunate to have, as one of my partners in advocacy, fellow autism parent Mark Blaxill, an Intellectual Property expert who has been employed by billion dollar corporations to manage their patents.


Blaxill was the man who found out that HHS, through NIH, owns patents on all HPV vaccines, and receives a percentage of the profits for each dose of Gardasil and Cervarix administered anywhere in the world. He published the stunning revelation in a detailed three part expose entitled, “A License to Kill? Part 1: How A Public-Private Partnership Made the Government Merck’s Gardasil Partner.” 

When I contacted Blaxill to ask how to run a patent search, he was kind enough to do it for me.


He found 57 granted US patents with the CDC listed as an assignee. You can see the search results here.


Upon cursory review of the patents, I found that one did not seem applicable to vaccination, but merely referenced an article on vaccination. That leaves us with 56 CDC patents to scrutinize.


Here is what I found.


There are CDC patents applicable to vaccines for Flu, Rotavirus, Hepatitis A, HIV, Anthrax, Rabies, Dengue fever, West Nile virus, Group A Strep, Pneumococcal disease, Meningococcal disease, RSV, Gastroenteritis, Japanese encephalitis, SARS, Rift Valley Fever, and chlamydophila pneumoniae.


There is a CDC patent for “Nucleic acid vaccines for prevention of flavivirus infection,” which has applications in vaccines for Zika, West Nile virus, Dengue fever, tick-borne encephalitis virus, yellow fever, Palm Creek virus, and Parramatta River virus. (Source)


CDC also has several patents for administering various ”shots” via aerosol delivery systems for vaccines. (Source)


There’s a CDC patent on a process for vaccine quality control by “quantifying proteins in a complex preparation of uni- or multivalent commercial or research vaccine preparations.” (Source)


There’s a CDC patent on a method “for producing a model for evaluating the antiretroviral effects of drugs and vaccines.”



CDC has a patent for companies who want to test their respiratory system applicable vaccine on an artificial lung system.



If a vaccine maker is concerned that their vaccine might contain a human rhinovirus, CDC has a patent on a process for determining if such contamination exists.



CDC has a patent on an assay to assist vaccine makers in finding antigen-specific antibodies in a biological sample. (Source)


CDC holds a patent that provides vaccine makers with a method of “reducing the replicative fitness of a pathogen by deoptimizing codons.” Asserting that, “pathogens with deoptimized codons can be used to increase the phenotypic stability of attenuated vaccines.” (Source)


The agency also holds a patent on adjuvants for a vaccine used on premature infants and young babies. (Source)


There is a CDC patent to cover a vaccine for an infection induced by a tape worm found in pork. (Source)


They even have patents that cover vaccines for animal illnesses including Canarypox virus, Fowlpox virus, Sealpox virus, dog flu and monkey cancer.


Does this seem like a public health agency making “independent” vaccine recommendations, or a private company with an impressive portfolio to which one might look for investment opportunities?


Please read the full article at GreenMedInfo.com by clicking here.



~Like, Comment, Share, Subscribe, & Enjoy!~



CDC declares medical police state, will punish those who do not comply

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recently announced that they have a new invasive plan for the “control of communicable diseases,” by detaining people SUSPECTED of being ill and then forcibly medicating them against their will.  Not CONFIRMED, but SUSPECTED.  Gee that phrase won’t be abused will it?


Hey if you don’t believe me, then look it up. The CDC’s new proposal is published in the Federal Register [#2016-18103], it will give the agency police state powers, permitting CDC officials to detain and forcibly inject chemicals into anyone they deem a threat to public health. There’s no rationale for such detainments either. According to the proposal, the “CDC defines precommunicable stage to mean the stage beginning upon an individual’s earliest opportunity for exposure to an infectious agent.”


This declarations means that the CDC now OWNS YOUR BODY!  That you have no right to refuse any injections or EXPERIMENTATIONS.


We know that vaccines cause severe health problems and that every year that goes by there are more reports of adverse health effects, including death, from the vaccines. If the CDC takes on these new powers, all the CDC will need is for the media to build up enough public fear against some new strain of virus (Zika), for a new vaccine to be introduce and forced on the public.  Anyone who questions or refuses could be forcibly injected and even jailed.  As the proposal reveals “.. individuals who violate the terms of the agreement or the terms of the Federal order for quarantine, isolation, or conditional release *even if no agreement is in place between the individual and the government), he/she may be subject to CRIMINAL PENALTIES.”  Yup, they are going to make it a criminal crime to refuse being injected with poisons.


There is a Global effort to indoctrinate and make people into vaccine and pharmaceutical obedience.  You are viewed as a subject with no rights.  Some Internal WHO documents show you as an adversary who needs to be psychologically manipulated into believing in vaccine “science”.  If this new CDC rule goes through, it’s not unrealistic to assume that any information you give out as you declare your opposition to forced injections could be used in the future to track you down and inject you against your will.


If this sounds familiar, then you maybe thinking of the medicial experimentations that were forced upon the Jews during the holocaust. When the Nazis claimed ownership over Jewish people’s bodies they eventually used police stat power to round them up and do whatever they wanted with them in the camps.  In essence, the CDC’s new rule gives the government authority to incarcerate Americans en masse, relocating them to camps to be medically experimented on with vaccines and other pharmaceutical products.


Personal protection (by whatever means) has never been more important, as the CDC accelerates this same type of Nazi ideology by claiming ownership over your body. Furthermore, it wouldn’t be hard to unleash a United Nations global police force into neighborhoods to round up vaccine dissenters. If the government claims ownership over your body, and has the military power to do whatever they want, people will take orders and do their jobs, no questions asked. As the document states,”When an apprehension occurs, the individual is not free to leave or discontinue his/her discussion with an HHS/CDC public health or quarantine officer.”


Finally, the document reveals that the CDC is doing away with informed consent altogether, (even though the American Medical Association still upholds it): “CDC may enter into an agreement with an individual, upon such terms as the CDC considers to be reasonably necessary, indicating that the individual consents to any of the public health measures authorized under this part, including quarantine, isolation, conditional release, medical examination, hospitalization, vaccination, and treatment; provided that the individual’s consent shall not be considered as a prerequisite to any exercise of any authority under this part.”



Sources include: