If Steel beams melt at 2,750 Degrees F, then how did jet fuel that burns at a rate of 1,500 Degrees F, compromise the structure integrity of the WTC Buildings to the point of full collapse? Also, if the planes impacted the top of the towers then how did the bottom of the towers become so weak to the point of full collapse? With this all in mind, there is another odd question still to be resolved:
WTC BLDG 7 was never hit by a plane, yet it collapsed fully as well. How was that possible?
~Like, Comment, Share, Tag, & Subscribe~
If you don’t believe what Mainstream News tells you than you are a “Conspiracy Theorist” right?! It seems that those who question are more sane than those who do not Recent studies have shown that those who question Mainstream News appear to be more sane than people who accept official (Mainstream) versions.
The most recent study was published in July 2013 by Psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent in the UK. Entitled “What about Building 7?’ A social Psychological Study of Online Discussion of 9/11 Conspiracy Theories,” the study compared “conspiracist,” and “conventionalist,” on news websites.
The researchers noted that they were surprised to find that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventional ones.
“Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist,” the researchers wrote.
‘The research showed that people who favored the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile’
So, for those who comment on news articles, those who question and suspect government accounts of events like 9/11 and JFK Assassination outnumber Mainstream believers by more than two-to-one.
So it would seem that the Conspiracy Theorists have a deeper, more thought out, and smarter conversation with facts (or debunking facts) while Mainstream News Believers resort to hostile conversations of name calling and bullying to attempt to prove their points.
~Like, Comment, Share, Subscribe
3 Buildings fell on 9/11/01. But the Lamestream News only reports, shows, and talks about 2 of them. Why? How did the 3rd Building fall when it was not hit by anything, had no damage to it, it just dropped?! Why is it that all 3 fell conviently as if it was a controlled demolition?
I do believe this was an inside job. I do believe that it was a controlled demolition. I’m not the only one to have this view point. The Renowned Physics Journal concludes in new study that ALL 3 WTC Towers Collapsed Due to Controlled Demolition!
Click the link below to read more from the Journal:
Below is a great video going into more detail on my thoughts on this issue:
Comment your thoughts below.